Skip to content
GenGraphic

AI agents

Agents that act within limits you define, not limits they guess at.

Where a task involves several steps and some judgement — researching, drafting, checking against multiple sources — an AI agent can help, provided it is given explicit tools, budgets, and approval gates rather than open-ended autonomy.

Problems this solves

Where an agent is more appropriate than a fixed workflow

  • The task requires checking several sources and combining the result, not a single fixed lookup.

  • The right next step depends on what earlier steps found, rather than following one fixed sequence.

  • A skilled person currently does this manually, in a way that is well-understood but time-consuming.

  • The task benefits from drafting or summarising, with a human reviewing before anything is finalised.

  • A fixed rule-based workflow would need constant updates to handle the task's natural variability.

What we deliver

  • A defined tool set

    The agent can only take actions we explicitly grant it — no open-ended system access.

  • Budgets and usage limits

    Cost ceilings and alerts so an agent cannot run unexpectedly expensive loops unnoticed.

  • Approval gates for consequential actions

    Anything that writes data, sends a message, or spends money is reviewed before it happens, unless explicitly agreed otherwise.

  • Full observability

    A traceable log of what the agent did, which tools it used, and why, for every run.

How the engagement works

A controlled path from task to trusted agent

  1. 01

    Define

    Specify the task, the tools the agent needs, and where human approval is required.

  2. 02

    Build with guardrails

    Implement budgets, tool limits, and approval gates alongside the agent's core logic.

  3. 03

    Pilot under supervision

    Run the agent on real tasks with close human review before reducing oversight.

  4. 04

    Scale deliberately

    Expand scope only once accuracy and safety are demonstrated, not assumed.

Relevant technologies

Chosen for control and observability

Agents

  • LLM APIs
  • Tool-calling frameworks

Controls

  • Budget enforcement
  • Approval gates
  • Audit logging

Infrastructure

  • Docker
  • PostgreSQL

Security and operational considerations

Autonomy with limits, not autonomy without them

  • Explicit allow-lists for which tools and systems an agent can access.

  • Hard budget ceilings, with alerts before limits are reached.

  • Human approval before any sensitive, irreversible, or costly action.

  • Full audit logs of every tool call an agent makes.

  • A kill switch to halt an agent's activity immediately if it behaves unexpectedly.

Related case studies

Case studies in progress

FAQ

Common questions

No. A chatbot typically answers questions; an agent can take multi-step actions using defined tools, which is why it needs explicit limits and approval gates rather than open access.

Considering an AI agent for a specific task?

Start by defining the task narrowly — the guardrails follow naturally from a clear scope.

We use privacy-friendly analytics to understand how the site is used. No non-essential tracking runs before you accept. Read our cookie policy.